Kanban vs Scrum: Agile Methodologies Face-Off [2024]

Teams across industries strive for methods that enhance productivity, flexibility, and efficiency in project management. Agile methodologies have emerged as beacons of adaptability in this quest, with Kanban vs Scrum leading the charge. Both frameworks share a common Agile ancestry, emphasizing incremental work, team collaboration, and customer satisfaction. However, their approaches to achieving these goals differ and are tailored to suit unique project requirements and team dynamics.Â

Certified ScrumMaster Certification TrainingLearn the Basics of Scrum and the Scrum LifecycleEXPLORE COURSE

Scrum is a structured approach to support teams in collaboratively creating, delivering, and maintaining complex products. It outlines specific roles, events, and deliverables to promote teamwork. This framework fosters a learning environment where teams can self-manage during problem-solving and reflect on their successes and failures, aiming for ongoing enhancement. Originating from the Agile Manifesto, Scrum embodies the principles of agility – customer-centricity, adaptability, and iterative progress.

Scrum breaks down large projects into smaller, manageable tasks completed in short cycles known as Sprints, typically lasting 2-4 weeks. Each Sprint aims to produce a potentially shippable product increment, allowing teams to adjust to changes and stakeholder feedback rapidly.

The Scrum process begins with the Product Owner creating a Product Backlog, a prioritized list of project requirements with descriptions of the desired work. During Sprint Planning, the team selects items from the Product Backlog they can commit to completing by the end of the Sprint, forming the Sprint Backlog.

Daily Stand-Up meetings facilitate team communication, allowing members to discuss progress, plans for the day, and any impediments. The Scrum Master addresses these impediments and ensures the team adheres to Scrum practices.

At the end of the Sprint, the team conducts a Sprint Review with stakeholders to demonstrate the work done, and a Sprint Retrospective allows the team to reflect and improve their process for the next Sprint.

Kanban is a popular lean method to improve workflow and efficiency in various projects and processes, particularly in software development and manufacturing. Originating from the Japanese word for “signboard” or “billboard,” Toyota first implemented Kanban in the 1940s to improve manufacturing efficiency. Various industries have since evolved and adopted it to manage work by visualizing tasks, limiting work in progress, and enhancing flow..Â

The essence of Kanban is to visualize work and maximize efficiency. Kanban achieves this through a Kanban board, a tool that visually represents the work to be done, the work in progress, and the work that has been completed. Tasks are represented by cards on the board, which move from one column to the next to reflect their progress through the workflow.

Master Scrum with 2-Day Immersive Online TrainingCertified ScrumMaster® Certification TrainingExplore Course

To best differentiate between the two approaches, we need to use a well-defined set of criteria, shown below.

No predefined roles; the team may have different roles that Kanban does not define

Work in Progress (WIP) limits, but no limit on work within a time frame

The choice between Scrum and Kanban depends on your team’s needs, the nature of your project, and your work environment.

Kanban and Scrum are grounded in Agile principles and share the ultimate goal of delivering high-quality products efficiently. They cater to different project needs and work environments. Scrum, with its structured sprints and defined roles, provides an excellent framework for projects that benefit from regular intervals of work and consistent progress checks. It’s particularly well-suited to teams that require clear direction and a rhythm to their development process.Â

Conversely, Kanban offers unparalleled flexibility and adaptability. It allows teams to easily manage fluctuating workloads and adjust to changes swiftly without the need for structured intervals.

Choosing between Kanban vs Scrum should not be seen as an either/or proposition but rather as a decision based on the specific demands of your project, the nature of your team, and your operational environment. In some cases, teams might benefit from combining elements of both methodologies to create a hybrid approach that best suits their unique circumstances.

Elevate your project management skills with the Certified Scrum Master (CSM) course, a comprehensive training program designed to cultivate your expertise in the Scrum framework. Offered by Simplilearn, a leader in professional certifications, this course not only prepares you to become an adept Scrum Master but also empowers you to drive team success in dynamic and complex project environments.

Kanban does not inherently use story points, as it focuses on continuous flow and reducing the time it takes to complete a work item rather than on estimating the effort of tasks.

The primary differences include Scrum’s fixed-length sprints and defined roles (Scrum Master, Product Owner, Development Team) versus Kanban’s continuous flow, lack of defined roles, and focus on managing work in progress.

Yes, Kanban and Scrum can be combined to leverage both strengths. For example, a team can use Scrum’s structured sprints and roles while applying Kanban’s visualization and WIP limits within those sprints.

If your project has stable priorities that fit well into time-boxed iterations, Scrum might be better. Choose Kanban for projects requiring flexibility and the ability to change priorities quickly.

For both, start with training the team on the chosen methodology. Then, for Scrum, establish roles and plan your first sprint. For Kanban, set up your board and define WIP limits.

Traditionally, Kanban does not use sprints as they are based on a continuous flow. However, some teams adapt Kanban to include sprints for specific purposes.

Jira supports both Scrum and Kanban methodologies. It offers templates and tools for managing projects with either approach, allowing teams to customize their workflow.

Scrum can be ideal for small to medium-sized teams that benefit from structured roles and sprints. Kanban is more flexible, scalable, and suitable for any team size, especially when priorities shift frequently.

Simplilearn is one of the world’s leading providers of online training for Digital Marketing, Cloud Computing, Project Management, Data Science, IT, Software Development, and many other emerging technologies.